He was facing a choice of either conceding that ethical regression could occur, or revise his theory
In the empirical research of people across their life-span, Kohlberg stumbled on observe that some people obviously have undergone moral level regression. Kohlberg chose the second, postulating the presence of sub-stages whereby the promising period has never but already been adequately integrated into the characteristics. Specifically Kohlberg mentioned of a stage 4A? or 4+, which is a transition from period four to stage five, discussing properties of both. In this phase the person has started to become disaffected together with the arbitrary characteristics of rules and purchase thinking. Culpability is generally transformed from being defined by culture to using culture by itself getting culpable. This period is often recognised incorrectly as the moral relativism of level two because the individual considers culture's conflicting welfare due to their own selections reasonably and morally wrong. Kohlberg noted this ended up being typically seen in youngsters getting into college.
Kohlberg more speculated that a seventh period may are present (Transcendental Morality or Morality of Cosmic positioning) that would connect religion with moral thinking (see James W. Fowler's levels of religion development). But considering Kohlberg's difficulty offering empirical proof even for a sixth stage, the guy emphasized that most of his conjecture towards a seventh stage was theoretical.
Theoretical presumptions (philosophy)
Kohlberg's idea is not value-neutral. They begins with a stake in some views in meta-ethics. Including by way of example a view of human instinct, and a particular knowledge of the proper execution and articles of moral thinking. They retains conceptions associated with correct additionally the range of moral reasoning across societies. Finally, it will require a view associated with the personal and psychological procedures associated with ethical thinking.
Read More